ANTIFEMINIST Models of Blogspot

Blog Has Moved

2011-02-03T18:47:00.002-06:00

This blog has moved. Additionally there will be a slight title change at the new location.
Since Antifeminist Models of Blogspot has seven posts which continue to be read by internet users on a fairly regular basis, it will NOT be deleted.

Michigan Husband Charged with Hacking Cheating Wife's Email

2010-12-30T14:36:00.002-06:00

A Michigan husband, Leon Walker, suspected his wife, Clara (who was on her third marriage) , was cheating on him. Walker decided to check her email to see if he could confirm her backstabbing.

According to the Guardian Newspaper, Walker found she was having an affair with her second husband, a man who had been arrested previously for beating her in front of her young son - born from her first marriage. Walker was therefore concerned for the child's safety. He decided to hand the emails over to the boy's father, (Clara's first husband). "I was doing what I had to do," Walker told the Detroit Free Press. "We're talking about putting a child in danger." The father then sought custody of the child.

When Clara discovered the emails had been read and passed on, she went to the authorities.

That is when Oakland County Prosecutor, a feminist named Jessica Cooper, charged Walker with a felony and a possible 5 year prision sentence. She said Walker broke the law by hacking into his wife's account. Cooper said his credentials as a trained computer technician make him a threat. "The guy is a hacker. [The computer] was password protected, he had wonderful skills, and was highly trained. Then he downloaded them and used them in a very contentious way," Cooper told the Detroit Free Press. Cooper was apparently angered a husband would try to protect himself from exploitation and mistreatment by his wife. This tactic is reserved only for wives of cheating husbands. No records have surfaced of Cooper ever charging any wife with hacking into her husband's computer.

Additionally, Cooper viewed Walker's protection of the child as irrelevant. Her only concern was the wife.

Prosecutor Jessica Cooper is a founding member of the National Association of Women Judges - a feminist organization. She served as one of its first publication editors. This organization published a document titled "Sentencing Women Offenders: A Training Curriculum for Judges" which advocated a two tiered judicial system based on gender. The emphasis of the document was that women should recieve lighter sentences than men even though they committed the same crime.

Feminism and justice do not mix. The two ideologies simply are not compatible.

Cooper's charges against Walker is another example of a feminist making a charade of the US judicial system. Instead of promoting justice and public saftey she is using her office to promote feminist double standard. Under these conditions, character guys like Walker - a man who protected someone else's child - will get chewed up every time.

Cooper is also one reason why men in Michigan should not get married. As her actions show, the Michigan judicial system views a husband as his wife's property.

Feminist Colonialism and America's Fading Power

2010-12-16T19:57:00.002-06:00

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a speech at the TED Women conference (a gathering organized to advocate social change using technology) promoting feminist colonialism. She emphasized that American foreign policy will be used to empower women and girls around the world. Her speech was laced with irony and hypocrisy.

Hillary stated "Let women [in other countries] work and they drive economic growth across all sectors. Send a girl to school even just for one year and her income dramatically increases for life, and her children are more likely to survive and her family more likely to be healthier for years to come. Give women equal rights and entire nations are more stable and secure. Deny women equal rights and the instability of nations is almost certain."

This is truely an ironic statement considering she represents a country which discriminates against boys education. In the U.S., there is more financial aid available to girls than boys and there are more learning programs oriented toward girls than boys. Thus more girls than boys are able to attend education beyond high school. According to the research firm, Reach Advisors, young men earn less than young childless women. The firm concluded the main reason why these men do not earn as much as women is education stating "Young women are going to college in droves". The firm said college enables women to command higher salaries. Additionally the fact Hillary believes women should drive a country's economic growth rather than all of its citizens clearly displays the classic female chauvinist philosphy of a feminist.

Hillary continued "..it is a girl who is still the first to drop out of school, the last to be fed, the last to receive medical care. And in too many places, she is taught there are special limits to what is possible for her".

This is more hypocrisy on her part considering that in America, it's boys whom are the first to drop out of school simply due to lack of effort on the part of our feminist education system. And it is boys whom our national media attempts to place limits on what they can do such as the recent article "Why We Need to Reimagine Masculinity" in Newseek magazine.

Hillary said the goal of empowering women and girls is a "central tenet" of American foreign policy. She said the status of women will be a key part of a new document the State Department is releasing stating "Therefore when I talk about why we need to integrate women's issues into discussions at the highest levels everywhere in the world, I'm not doing it just because I have a personal commitment or because President Obama cares about it. I'm doing it because it's in the vital interests of the United States of America."

This shows the American government is acting as a feminist colonial power. It is trying to force other countries to adopt feminst culture. Infact, integrating feminist ideolgy into diplomatic relations is one of the major reasons why many countries have come to resent America. Our governement is telling the world how they should live their lives. It is attempting to force foreign countries to adopt our female chauvinist laws. Yet, many countries don't want paternity fraud nor rape fraud to be legal. They don't want to adopt a two tiered judicial system which punishes men more severly than women for comitting the same crime. They don't want an education system which discriminates against boys.

Today, many countries view America as a fading power. They see its education & judicial systems deterioting under the rot of feminism. They want no part of America's feminist colonial agenda.

Feminist Propaganda in the American Media

2010-11-02T18:36:00.002-05:00

America's national media has become a tool used by feminist to spread their propaganda. It is an arrangement similar to 20th century's Russia's control of its media to spread communist propaganda. In some cases, feminists have even begun using male cronies to promote their ideology.

For example, the chief legal analyst for NBCnews is writing a book that promotes female chauvinism. Titled "Man Down" this book will claim women are better police officers, financial managers, gamblers and world leaders than men. The journalist stated "many serious studies and research reached the same conclusion that women, as a group, are more thoughtful, efficient, tougher and less likely to make mistakes." It appears his book will borrow many ideas and tactics from the early 20th century American south. During that time period there were many studies claiming whites, as a group, are more thoughtful, efficient, tougher and less likely to make mistakes than blacks. The NBC journalist is an example of the narrow minded mentality that exists throughout this news organization. And this female chauvinism naturally extends to their reporting.

In another example, The Atlantic Magazine printed an article titled 'The End Of Men". It declared that women are the majority of the American workforce, the majority of managers and earn most of the college degrees. And like NBC, it declared they are better and more innovative senior managers than men. It also stated male leaders are controlling while female leaders take into account the rights of others. Lastly, The Atlantic stated single men suffer more financial difficulty than married men & that many men are desperate to be fathers. This last claim appears to reflect growing media anger at the increasing numbers of men avoiding marriage and the journalist's to put a 'positive spin' on the situation. However, unmarried college educated men are the one male group feminists seem to have difficulty exploiting. They are immune to abuse from the American family court system and less likely to be paternity fraud victims. The Atlantic concluded that women shall dominate all fields and control society.

Newsweek wrote a feature titled "Why We Need to Reimagine Masculinity" The feature promoted the new definition of masculinity as a man who gets married, stays home, cleans the house and watches the kids. Alternatively, they can become nurses. The magazine did not believe masculinity should be defined as a man going to college and becoming a doctor, biologist, chemist, engineer, software programmer or data communications analyst. The philosophy of limiting men's opportunities is in agreement with feminist sexist ideology. This philosophy has even been adopted by federal institutions such as the National Science Foundation. Increasingly, the Foundation has awarded educational grants with the stipulation the student or teacher cannot be male.

In a final example, Time Magazine wrote an article titled "The New Sheriffs of Wall Street". This article claimed only men are to blame for the American financial wreckage, calling the banking industry "a testosterone-filled trading culture". However, TIME did not mention that the banking industry, including Savings institutions, is 70% female - as per the Bureau of Labour Statistics. These women have made many decisions throughout the failed banking sector.

The American national media is not a source of objective news analysis. Instead it is used as a feminist propaganda outlet to promote classic female chauvinism.

Missouri Releases Women Who Killed Husbands

2010-09-14T17:26:00.003-05:00

Three Missouri women convicted of murdering their husbands many years ago will be released from prison on parole because of claims of spousal abuse. A feminist group of attorneys called the Missouri Battered Women's Clemency Coalition has argued for the women's release, claiming they were driven to kill after suffering abuse at the hands of their husbands. This is a standard claim of any wife who kills her husband thereby making domestic violence against husbands completely legal in America.

The Missouri wives were released based on a feminist state law passed in 2007. This law stipulates women who had murdered their spouses could be eligible for parole if they had a history of "substantial physical abuse or sexual domestic violence" not presented at their trial and they served 15 years of prison time. The law allows a wife to change her story at a later date if necessary to gain release from prison.

One of the wives being released was convicted in 1978 of conspiring with her boyfriend to shoot her husband as he lounged in a chair in his Springfield, Mo., home. The fact that this wife had time to find a boyfriend, go on dates and screw around while remaining married rather than leaving her husband clearly shows that any abuse claim is nothing more than female chauvinist crap. Imagine what would happen if a husband found a girlfriend then killed his wife.

Prosecutors said another wife claimed she was worried she would lose her children in a custody dispute. That is a farce. Husbands are routinely discriminated against in child custody disputes.

The Missouri Battered Women's Clemency Coalition as well as other feminist groups consider domestic violence as a husband killing his wife. When the reverse happens they do not consider it a crime.

While admittedly, none of these women served short sentences for their crimes, America's judicial system is increasingly controlled by feminists organizations. This is important because groups such as Missouri Battered Women's Clemency Coalition, National Association of Women Judges etc have continuously advocated a two tiered judicial system. One for men and one for women. Because of their powerful influence, these groups are increasingly able to get laws passed which reflect their sexist ideology. As evidence, a St. Louis reporter from KSDK TV states "Advocates (feminists) say the outcome would have been much different had these women been tried now". In other words, its doubtful any of them would have been convicted.

This is one of the many reasons why men in America should be EXTREMELY hesitant to get married. When you become a husband you are considered as nothing more than your wife's property in the eyes of America's feminist laws.

Women Who Are Hypocrites

2010-08-19T19:49:00.003-05:00

Women have created websites which list the names and residences of men who cheat.
One of the most popular websites is "Womansavers.com". This site allows a woman to list the full name of any man and his town of residence. She can also rate his character, commitment, trustfulness, and abusefulness as well as add comments about him. None of the comments need to be verified. Her word is considered truth. Additionally, photos of the man can be uploaded so he can clearly be identified on the street.

However, this website operates on the feminist principle of gender double standard. There is no way to rate a woman's character or trustfulness on this site. Her name and town cannot be listed. As is the case throughout feminist society, she is considered above questioning. What makes this website's double standard truly astounding is its conclusion that there is only a small difference in the infidelity rate between the genders with men being slightly higher. Even more astounding, however, is a survey conducted by the website in which 49% of women said they cheated. Another 26% said that they'd have no problem stepping out on their husbands or boyfriends if they knew they could get away with it. THIS MAKES MANY WOMEN ON THIS SITE BLATANT HYPOCRITES.

Furthermore, the website has a forum allowing users to engage in discussions. Many members on the forum post excuses on why they have had affairs. They also support other members who have stepped out on their husbands and boyfriends. A few men have commented in the forum. Some have posted their wives were unfaithful. Many members will defend the wife's actions, claiming the husband must have done something wrong. However it should be stated not all members defend backstabbing wives. Some heavily criticize them. Others tell the mistreated husband to stop being a doormat.

"Womansavers.com" is not the only website listing the names of cheating men. Another popular website is "Dont Date Him Girl". This website actually appears to be even more hypocritical than Womensavers. For example, on the site's forum, a husband posted the full names of his backstabbing wife and the sleazebag other man. The site's members criticized him for posting their names - despite the fact there are dozens of men's full names on the forum. Another man asked if there was a website listing the names of unfaithful women. He was denounced and mocked. According to "OnLine Dating Magazine" a man listed on "Dont Date Him Girl" actually took a blood test to prove he did not give his ex girlfriend herpes. The obvious conclusion is his ex girlfriend either lied about the story or was an unfaithful whore who has no idea which man gave her herpes. However, it should be noted this website was not completely researched for this post.

Hypocrite women who believe infidelity is wrong ONLY for men are useful ONLY as sex toys. They have no value in longterm relationships and are worthless as wives.
A cheating woman is EXACTLY the same as a cheating man. Only a female chauvinist nitwit (i.e. a feminist) will claim elsewise.

Female Chauvinism at Time Magazine

2010-06-23T03:15:00.000-05:00

Time Magazine's female chauvinist philosophy was displayed in its recent cover story "Female Sheriffs of Wall Street".

The article claimed only men are to blame for the American financial crisis. The magazine called the banking industry "a testosterone-filled trading culture" and stated large banks are run exclusively by men. Therefore, it was men's stupid and greedy decisions which caused the financial collapse.

While the person in charge should always be held accountable, Time's female chauvinist journalists did not mention women comprise 70% of the banking industry. It also did not mention many women were in charge of loan making decisions and made loans to businesses or home owners with limited ability to repay the debt. Many defaulted thereby contributing to the crisis. Additionally, many real estate agents (another profession predominately female) contributed to the crisis, by convincing home buyers to purchase houses they could not afford. These agents aspired to collect the large commission fees associated with overinflated housing prices. Lastly, how many mortgages were foreclosed because the wife forced the husband to buy a house beyond what the family could afford simply because she wanted to live a specific lifestyle? Based on personal stories, at least several.

This article did not judge people on the basis of their actions. Rather, it judged them on the basis of their gender.

Continuing its female chauvinist theme, the magazine also stated "Sisterhood Is Powerful" and "the women {throughout the industry} have learned how to work together better". It wasn't people working together better, only women working together. This narrow minded feminist mentality is comparable to the ignorance of various racist groups in America.

And in a further display of female chauvinism, the publication quoted Sheila Bair "My favorite is when you are at a meeting and you say something, and it's just dead silence, Fifteen minutes later, some guy says exactly the same thing, and everybody is nodding their head." Men feel the same way about the judicial system. A woman commits the same crime as a man yet receives a completely different punishment. Judicial double standard is a far more important issue than whether or not someone nods their head to the princess.

This whole article does nothing more than promote sexism and the feminist idea that men are inferior to women.

Promoting female chauvinism is not unusual for Time.
In a previous article publicizing feminism, both Time and a feminist author being interviewed, criticized the TV show The Bachelor. The author stated "women are basically cast as obsessed with men". However, neither the publication nor the author had a problem with the TV show The Bachelorette. That article concluded by stating both women and men should become more indignant about pay equity for women, sexual harassment, paid maternity leave and "a whole host of issues that are still the unfinished business of our movement {feminism}". However, both Time and the feminist author excluded issues such as paternity fraud, domestic violence against men, equal access to college grants for men, rape fraud or anti-husband child custody laws as relevant to society.

Hypocrisy and gender double standard are common themes of Time Magazine. Another way of saying this is: Feminism is a common theme of Time Magazine.

Men, Boys And Feminist Myths

2010-05-23T19:33:00.000-05:00

In yet another feminist myth study, the University of Northern Iowa claims their research clearly shows "{Women} are more adept to make decisions that reflect group preferences, rather than just individual preferences." Men were deemed self centered. The Northern Iowa researchers state "Women tend to take all members' opinions into consideration in order to reach a universal consensus". These researchers, as well as feminists within the media, are promoting this study as a reason Solicitor General Elena Kagan should be confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice.

However, the University did not explain why paternity fraud remains legal in most states and why female politicians continue to ignore mens views on the issue. The University also did not explain why rape fraud continues to go unpunished and why many female politicians continue to ignore mens views on the issue. Lastly the university did not explain why divorce laws continue to be anti husband and why female politicians continue to ignore men's views (See Barbara Boxer for further details). In fact this University study like many University studies in the US is based on obsolete sexist ideas about men and women.

Another way of saying this is that the University of Northern Iowa study is based on feminist myths. These researchers don't get that its personality not gender that matters.

It appears American Universities are wasting money producing studies soley to promote feminist myths. For example, Villanova University states its study demonstrates girls are equal to boys in math skills. Girls only need to be "given the right educational tools". The underlying message of the study was that even though girls are the emphasis of American education, even more attention needs to be paid to them. Male students do not need assistance. Additionally these same feminist claim that females students are naturally better at comprehensive reading than males. Since girls are equal to boys in math and better than them in reading, the obvious conclusion is that boys are less intelligent than girls- a standard feminist myth.

The University of Chicago produced a study claiming that female students failure at math is caused by female school teachers who are anxious about math. However the University claims male students in the same class are unaffected. The underlying message of the study was more attention needs to be paid to girls. Boys do not need assistance - even though more girls than boys go to college.

American Universities are wasting, time, money and human resources on studies designed to promote feminist myths. These resources would be better spent assisting students with college coursework & helping them pay their ridiculously high tuition.
Feminism is a drain on the American education system.

Teacher Sex Scandal

2010-03-31T18:00:00.002-05:00

A sex scandal involving Utah High school teacher Melissa Andreini, 29, and a 15 year old boy, resulted in Ms. Andreini being sentenced to only 120 days in jail. Utah's male teachers involved in sex scandals with the same age girl appear to receive (on average) 1.5 - 3 years jail time.

Some now claim there is a nationwide gender double standard within America's judicial system. Many female teachers involved in sex scandals appear to get far less jail time than their male counterparts.

For example, Christy Brown, 33, a teacher at Utah Cyprus High School, was convicted of having sex with a 16-year-old boy yet served no jail time. Cameo Patch, a 29-year-old substitute high school teacher was found guilty of engaging in sex acts with a 17-year-old student. She also served no time. In another scandal, Autumn Lee Leathers, 25-year-old English teacher at Mountain Ridge High School, Maryland had a sexual relationship with a 15 year old male student. Again - no jail time. Instead, she received a one year suspended sentence. This is the same state where female delegates recently introduced a dating bill for men. The bill requires all Maryland men to submit fingerprints & background information for investigation before they can communicate with foreign woman thru international dating sites. The female delegates claim men take advantage of foreign women - yet it was the female teacher who took advantage of a minor & went unpunished!

Some groups defend an adult women's "right" to have sexual relations with a 15 year old boy but express outrage at a 15 year old girls relationship with an adult man. These same groups also claim girls mature faster than boys. If so, then BOYS ARE LESS MENTALLY PREPARED FOR A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP THAN GIRLS. THIS MAKES BOYS EASIER TO MANIPULATE THAN GIRLS. In a sexual relationship, adult women manipulate boys like puppets - thus making the judicial double standard appalling.

This judicial double standard also extends to other areas of crime such as domestic violence and robbery. In the American judicial system, female criminals are never held accountable for their actions to the same degree as males.

The reason is feminism.

A member of the website Antimisandry discovered a 'National Institute of Corrections'(NIC) document titled "Sentencing Women Offenders: A Training Curriculum for Judges". The document was written by the National Association of Women Judges and advocates a two tiered sentencing system. One for men and one for women. The document can be summarized with its statements "A strong case can be made that those who sentence women offenders are morally and ethically justified, perhaps even mandated, in ensuring that levying the same sentence on a female offender as on a male offender does not in reality impose far greater deprivations on the woman because of her gender." and " In many cases, that lack of information {about women criminals} leads to oversanctioning." Thus women should not be sentenced the same as men for the same crime.
This conclusion is based on standard feminist theory that men are inherently evil and women are inherently good. The feminist judiciaries also state "{Research by Women's Groups} is better understanding the roles of physical and sexual abuse, drug addiction, and mental illness in shaping the criminal involvement of these women." and "{A women} is likely to have been the subordinate member in a coercive relationship with a male criminal whom they assisted in committing the crime." Thus, the judiciaries claim a woman's involvement in crime is a man's fault - and, ofcourse, a man's involvement in crime is a man's fault.

Another NIC document titled "Women and the Criminal Justice System: Gender Matters" also supports the idea of a two tiered sentencing system. The document was written by a Women's Studies professor & states that gender should matter in the sentencing of criminals.

The NIC has a host of other feminist documents written over the last decade which advocate lighter sentencing for women, claiming that men drive women to commit crimes. While none of these documents are law, they appear to be used as guidelines in the American Judicial system. This is similar to education documents issued by the feminist group "The Women's Law Center". These education documents are not law, yet most school districts adhere to them. This is the reason why boys aged 4 to 10 are suspended for alleged sexual harassment in schools.

In America, judicial law has been replaced by feminist law. And that is a disgrace.

Individuals should be judged solely on the basis of their actions not their gender or race or religion or other such stupidity.

Why Has My Wife Cheated

2010-03-04T19:52:00.000-06:00

Many bewildered husbands have asked "Why has my wife cheated on me?" According to infidelity researchers often quoted by media outlets such as ABC News, MSNBC etc, a wife cheats because her husband is self centered, inattentive and uncaring .These same sources also state the reason why a husband cheats is because HE is self centered and uncaring. The idea infidelity is always a man's fault is directly from feminist ideology.

Men are being lied to.

The reason why a married woman cheats is because she is a self centered person. She is also double standard.

As an example, one wife who cheated said "As long as my husband continues to pay the mortgage then thats all he needs to worry about. He doesn't need to worry about what I do." However, she still demands her husband remain faithful.
In another example, a wife cheated for several months but was caught. The husband threw her out of the house but would not divorce her. The husband's friends yelled at him "your wife is a selfish jerk" & wanted to know why he was still married to her. However, this woman continuously told her husband she was sorry and she loved him. She also still expected him to remain faithful. After 3 weeks, the husband accepted her apology. Eleven months later she was caught fooling around again & the process repeated itself.
Another wife cheated with her husband's best friend. The husband's relatives had always viewed her as self centered. However, the husband kept disagreeing, saying "Not my wife" - until he caught her with his friend. During the divorce one relative asked him "Why did you make us put up with that selfish bitch for so long?"
Another wife cheated simply because a man hit on her. She strongly resented doing anything for her husband and was self centered. An extended family member - wondering why the husband was still with her - stated "She must be the best thing in town (in bed) because there simply is nothing else to like about her. Certainly not her personality." She still demands faithfulness from her husband.

These wives all had the same personality traits of selfishness and hypocrisy. All were only happy when the marriage was focused on themselves. They all resented having to help their husband with anything which was not interesting. They all believed that while they play around, their husbands must remain faithful.

And from the internet, the stories are the same.

A married woman said husbands should be understanding and forgiving when they are cheated on. She said she had cheated on her husband because the marriage was no fun but after going on a family trip and laughing together she decided to wean herself off her boyfriend. This was taking many months. She said husbands should not expect it to happen overnight. In the meantime she still expects her husband to remain faithful.
An Army wife stated she cheated many times while her husband was deployed but he recently found out about 2 of the affairs - there were others. She said he wants nothing more to do with her. This military spouse now wants advice on how she can convince her husband to stay married. She justified her affairs by saying that she felt lonely & it felt good to be in the arms of men who wanted her, wined and dined her and relieved her frustration. However, she still demands her husband be faithful. He cannot relieve his frustration with other women. The Army wife believed cheating was only her prerogative not her husband's.
Another married woman posted she cheated many times with several different boyfriends. However, her husband found out about one of the boyfriends but she convinced him the affair was his fault. Additionally, she demanded he remain faithful.
A husband posted "I found out my wife was having an affair" after 1.5 years of marriage. He said they went to marriage counseling for 6 months & he thought she was being sincere. However, unknown to him, she began screwing around again. Over the next decade she had at least 7 different boyfriends. Eventually he caught her fooling around and subsequently found out about her other boyfriends. He now states "If your wife is screwing around then you have spent those agonizing nights wondering where she is, only to hear some bullshit excuse that you want to believe despite overwhelming evidence against it. Grow a backbone and call a lawyer.." "Your marriage is a sham and you need to deal with it or you will die a little every day."
Another husband posted that he caught his wife with her boyfriend but tried to work it out for the sake of the kids. They went to counseling. Later, he found out she was playing around with a new boyfriend. After he divorced her, he discovered she had cheated many times with multiple boyfriends during the marriage. He now states if you catch your wife cheating "more than likely she's done it before." He recommends getting rid of her otherwise "she will only drag you down further and further".

Being self centered and double standard are common personality traits of an unfaithful wife. This type of wife believes her marriage should be mostly about what she wants rather than an equal partnership with her husband. She becomes resentful if she has to help her husband, or if a problem in life arises, or if the marriage is not centered around herself. These things are not considered fun. She then becomes unhappy & cheats. However, she still demands faithfulness from her husband.

Cheating is the scourge of society. It hurts people. A cheating wife IS the same as a cheating husband. But the female chauvinist media & researchers don't see it that way. Instead, they promote feminist double standard.

Decreasing Percentage of College Graduates Are Men

2010-01-04T19:26:00.006-06:00

A decreasing percentage of American college graduates are men. In 2010, 42% of college graduates will be men as compared with 58% of graduates being women. In 1970, approximately 60% of college graduates were men.

There appear to be 2 reasons why the percentage of male college graduates is falling.

The first reason is economic discrimination. Women have more financial aid available to them than men. Big corporations donate money to college grant programs with the stipulation that men not receive any of it. Corporations such as Walmart, Home Depot, Starbucks, Pfizer, Coldwell Banker, JP Morgan, Robert Half International, The General Electric Company and Prudential have donated large sums of money to college grant programs such as The Business and Professional Women Foundation, and the American Association of University Women. These programs provide college grants only to female students.

Additionally, the National Science Foundation (a federal agency) has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars over the last few years for college grants with the stipulation the student cannot be a man. These donations have gone to organizations such as Women in Engineering and Computer and Information Science, American Association of University Women, and The Association for Women In Science Scholarships. This is a violation of Title IX and is government sponsored discrimination.

Lastly, some - not all - professional women donate tens of thousands dollars every year to grant programs such as The American Association of University Women, The P.E.O. Program, The Educational Foundation for Women in Accounting, and The Business and Professional Women Foundation. These programs hand out tens of thousands of dollars for college tuition with the stipulation the student not be a man.

It is financially easier for a woman to go to college and graduate than a man.

The second reason for the decreasing percentage of male college graduates is education discrimination.

In the subjects of math and science, girls have more assistance and encouragement than boys. Programs such as The National Girls Collaborative Project, Women & Math Program, The National Math & Science Young Leaders Program, The All Girls/All Math Program and many others across America are designed to promote learning solely among girls. These programs are financed by corporations such as Exxon, Fortune, GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Cisco Systems and even the Federal government. There is no comparable or equal assistance for boys. Many colleges and Universities such as Meredith College, Michigan State University, University of Nebraska & many others also sponsor similar girls only learning programs. Additionally, institutions such as Carnegie Science Center & Arizona Science Center coordinate math & science learning programs with local teachers to ensure girls succeed in these subjects. Boys are not given the same encouragement.

In today's information age, reading has become a very important subject. Many US schools use poetry & novels to teach reading. The literatures taught are specifically designed to appeal to girls. They are generally based on various character's feelings and emotions. Most literatures allegedly designed for boys are also written from the same emotional perspective. Thus, boys generally find reading class unappealing. A few teachers have allowed students some freedom in selecting literatures for learning, including offering novels based on adventure, exploration, and hobbies - subjects which commonly appeal to boys. Thus, the development of a boy's reading skills appears to depend on how many open minded teachers he encounters.

America's education system is designed to promote the advancement of girls into college.

To further emphasize it is America's sexist education policies that is causing the drop in percentage of male college graduates, Chinese and Japanese boys do not experience the education difficulties of American boys.

A few teachers have rebelled, notably Judith Kleinfeld. They want the education system modified to address boys's difficulties.However, there has been resistance to solving boys education problems. The American Association of University Women, Time Magazine, the Association of Colleges & Universities American and Feminist Teacher Journal are openly against altering the education system to help boys. They insist girls should remain the focus of American education. These organizations state men often get high paying jobs in manufacturing and construction - jobs which require no college degree. Thus, boys won't have a problem in adult life. However, since 1980, about 5 million manufacturing jobs have been eliminated in America. Additionally, construction jobs are highly unstable. They only pay well when they are available. These fields no longer provide a financial future.

A college degree is now very important for remaining employed. This fact is displayed by the current recession. The vast majority of layoffs are men who have no college education. Additionally, the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that since 1970, the unemployment rate for high school graduates has been twice the unemployment rate of college graduates. Lastly a study by Dr. Beveridge appears to show wages for men as a group, adjusted for inflation, have declined since 1970 largely due to a lack of education.

America has learned nothing from its early 20th century past - an era of mass discrimination. The narrow minded arrogance which excluded large groups of people from higher learning in that era, continues to control education in the 21st century. People who intentionally inhibit the advancement of groups of students should be swept aside.

Why Men Increasingly Avoid Marriage

2009-11-02T17:49:00.003-06:00

Across the internet, women have begun making statements such as: Why are men avoiding marriage? Why do guys avoid commitment? Being single sucks.

A Carl Weisman study showed American men are increasingly avoiding marriage. Men fear getting involved in bad marriages with bad wives. This fear is partly driven by the feminist based anti-husband messages of women's magazines and writers.

For example, Parenting Magazine claims their marriage survey shows moms are angry at their husbands "at surprising levels". They state husbands "often don't notice what needs to be done around the house or with the kids". They also claim husbands have "more time to themselves" as compared with moms. Their survey stated 46% of moms get irate with their husbands once a week or more. Lisa Bain, executive editor of Parenting Magazine said "The truth is if you prick any one of us with a little pin, anger comes out". Female writers of ABC News and the Associated Press discussed the survey and expressed outrage at husbands.

However, the magazine's survey completely ignored husbands. No husband was asked anything. His opinions were considered unimportant. His efforts at work were ignored and he was largely unappreciated by his wife.

One stay at home mom participating in the survey stated she was angered at her husband (who worked 11 hour days) because he set aside some time one day a week to be an independent music producer - something he enjoyed. Another wife responding to the survey stated though her husband did 60% of the housework plus his job, she was angered she had to ask him to do housework.

Single men wonder why is he doing 60% of the work plus his job. They think: Why should I get married if my opinions don't matter. Why would I want to marry a woman who will be mad at me every week for the rest of my life because I don't do things her way? Why is she my boss?

It should also be noted none of the wives in the survey report stated they help their husband with house repairs. Additionally, Glen Sacks stated, according to the Bureau of Labor Statics, men's time to themselves is a meaningless 1% higher than women's.

Another women's magazine, called Double X, promotes books where wives cheat on their husbands. The book 'Prospect Park West' was promoted with the headline "Mommies Want to Have Sex, Just Not With Their Husbands". The book 'The Seven Year Itch' was promoted with the question "is it still realistic to expect wives to remain faithful to their husbands?" Conversely Double X continuously criticizes cheating husbands. The feminist notion its acceptable for a wife to cheat but wrong for her husband to be unfaithful has also been promoted by the online women's magazine Ivillage (though not all its writers agree with this mentality), female writers of the online magazine Askmen and, incredibly, Men's Health Magazine. Additionally, female reporters of ABCNews & Good Morning America continuously criticize cheating husbands. They refuse to criticize cheating wives.

Single men think: Why get married if its ok for my wife to cheat but I have to remain faithful? Why should I give up dating different women to be married to a cheating wife? Why should I accept abuse?

Many husbands have begun asking these same questions and have begun dumping their cheating wives in increasing numbers. This has given rise to websites such as "Stop Your Divorce in 4weeks" and "Cheatingways". These sites seek to prevent husbands from divorcing their cheating wives. The 2nd site (owned by a woman) actually encourages wives to cheat on their husbands. It offers wives a wealth of tips on how to deceive and fraud their husband. The site apparently was not founded with this intent but, like most of the country, drifted into an anti-husband mentality.

Single men think: Since marriage means the exploitation of husbands then why the hell should I get married? Do they think I'm stupid?

Lastly, American divorce laws also cause men to fear marriage.
The feminist judicial system often rules against husbands in divorce. Husband's are usually ordered to pay large alimony / child support payments to the ex-wife. Some claim the child support payments contain hidden alimony. In most states, these payments don't decrease if the ex-wife's income dramatically increases after the divorce. Though some wives with high paying jobs have been ordered to pay alimony/child support to their ex-husbands, many judges are reluctant to apply divorce laws equally. Additionally, if the husband later loses his job & fails to continue child support payments, he will be jailed.
A husband may also face false accusations of sexual and child abuse during the divorce. In those states with heavy feminist bureaucracy, the husband - like the Duke and Hofstra rape fraud cases - will have to prove his innocence. Some wives will interfere with the husband's visitation rights to his children. In feminist oriented states, the courts will do nothing to stop her. And paternity fraud remains legal.
The divorce system is designed to trap men in bad marriages with bad wives.

An increasing number of American men are now reaching the conclusion that being a husband is not worth it. The better deal is to remain single and have a series of relationships with different women while pursuing hobbies and life goals.
Additionally, a college educated single man can have a very good life.

What if everything were reversed. What if only a husband's perspective was important in marriage and cheating was only wrong for the wife. What if the family court system discriminated against wives?
Would American women want to become wives to the massive degree they do today?
Doubtful.
By nature, men and women are companions. By feminism, men and women are now adversaries.

Hofstra Rape Fraud

2009-10-01T18:56:00.001-05:00

At Hofstra University, a student claimed she was tied up in a dorm bathroom and gang raped by five men. The police subsequently identified and arrested all five men. They were thrown in jail. The rape claim turned out to be rape fraud. It was Duke University all over again.

Similar to the Duke University Rape fraud, police immediately released the names of the accused men.
Similar to the Duke University Rape fraud, the media printed the names and faces of the accused men AND ASSUMED THEY WERE GUILTY.
Similar to the Duke University Rape fraud the accused men had to prove they were innocent otherwise they were going to jail.

The accused are supposed to be presumed innocent. But in a feminist society this doesn't happen. Guilt and rights are based on gender. Both the media and police pre-judged the men based on feminist stereotypes.

Also similar to Duke University, the media resisted printing the name of the fraudulent woman - even after evidence clearly showed she was a liar - and no criminal charges were filed against her.

In rape fraud, a jailed innocent man will suffer more than a woman who is raped one evening. For example, on a date rape, the woman will go thru perhaps several hours of hell with the raping jerk but then she can begin to recover her life both physically and mentally. The jailed innocent man will suffer all day and the next day, the next week, the next month and the next year. He will suffer the entire time he is in jail. The average jail time for rape is about 5 years. During this time, the innocent man will be raped by other prisoners and repeatedly beaten up. Jail is not a nice place - not for innocent people. Rape, assault and "click warfare" are fairly common. Only after his jail sentence is served, can the innocent man try to recover physically and mentally.

It is extremely rare for women who intentionally falsely accuse men of rape to be convicted of a crime. Yet one study, by Frank Zepezauer, concluded 25% of rape complaints were fraud. Another study by Eugene Kanin also concluded about a 25% fraud rate. Revenge for ending a relationship, covering up cheating or a desire for corporate advancement were the most common reasons cited by women for false claims of rape. However, the main reason was probably because these women knew nothing would happen to them. They had nothing to lose. If there was justice, they would have been jailed.

The District Attorney in the Hofstra case at least made some attempt to prevent the fraud from going unpunished. The DA made the woman agree to 250 hours of community service.
At the the very least,anyone guilty of rape fraud should be fined $2500, have a criminal record and (as long as the innocent person serves no jail time) sentenced to 250 hours of community service - the service activity to be decided by the county in which the fraud was committed. But even this extremely light sentence is not being issued in most rape fraud cases due to the fact many district attorney's are feminist lackeys. They follow the direction of institutions such as the Women's Law Center rather than the American Constitution.

The American judicial system - as well as our media - judges people on the basis of their gender not their actions.

Until feminism is defeated this kind of narrow minded ignorance will continue.

American Doctors Are Lazy

2009-08-26T20:53:00.002-05:00

American doctors are lazy. There is a lack of effort to help patients with their difficulties. Most general physicians are ok. It is the so called "specialists" that are the problem. These doctors are the vascular surgeons, neurologists, orthopedics etc.
It is far too difficult in this country to get an appointment with a specialist. The average wait for an appointment may be 4 to 8 weeks. Meanwhile, the patient's life is in turmoil waiting for the appointment. Often, they are unable to do many normal activities and are in pain.
When the patient finally arrives at the specialist's office, they will be fortunate if the doctor listens to their complaints. Also, the doctor may order tests such as an MRI or Bone Scan. It can take weeks or even months to complete all the test the specialist orders. Thus, more time is wasted waiting for a correct diagnosis. The patient's life stagnates and rots.
The specialist receives results from MRI'S, Bone scans, Nerve studies or other test in the form of reports - sometimes with images. The doctor searches the report for something that stands out - like a shining beacon of light. If there is nothing obvious then it means the patient's problem requires too much effort to think about. The sick person will be sent away with a "wild guess diagnosis".
Additionally, if the office has many doctors, one specialist will not consult another specialist about the patient's problem. Every patient gets only one doctor's knowledge not the whole clinic's knowledge.
It could take months OR EVEN SEVERAL YEARS for the patient to receive a correct diagnosis. Many times the patient will never receive any help at all. Their lives may be ruined.
In frustration, some patients try to diagnosis themselves. While its possible for a person to properly diagnosis themselves (using information from the test reports and researching it on the internet) they should not be doing the doctor's job. Specialists get paid about $150/hr. They can't take 10 minutes to think about a patient's problem? That's being lazy. Its also being greedy.
Anyone not getting proper medical care should consider firing their doctor. This can easily be done by calling their office and canceling a future appointment. Before firing a doctor, a patient should make certain they have copies of all their test results and reports. This will ensure the new doctor does not repeat any test. Also, patients should consult with their insurance plan to determine the ease of moving from one specialist to another.

Finally, there are several web sites which allow patients to rate and research doctors. The most popular appears to be Ratemds. Any person having problems getting a correct diagnosis should rate their doctor on one of these sites. Conversely, if someone found a helpful doctor, rate them highly so that other patients know this doctor won't waste their time.

President Obama claims he is a president of change. If so, then he should worry about improving the inefficiency of the american medical joke system rather than improving relations with a police state like Cuba.

Notice:
I continue to be dogged by a scumbag virius as well as several other issues. I will contribute to the antifeminist movement / rebellion as best as possible.

October

2008-10-13T12:29:00.007-05:00

I have been fighting a viral disease for 9 weeks with many things going wrong. if I make it, I will post again, if not then I won't.
Anyone may use the ideas in these posts or link to them as they wish.
As stated, individuals should be judged on the basis of their actions - not on the basis of what clique, if any, they belong to.

Paternity Fraud and Tricked Husbands

2008-08-03T17:59:00.005-05:00

In the United States a cheating wife made pregnant by her boyfriend can trick her husband into believing the child is his own. This is paternity fraud.

Paternity fraud is legal throughout most of the country. Additionally, if a tricked husband divorces his cheating wife, most states require him to pay child support EVEN IF THE CHILDREN ARE NOT HIS. This is one of the reasons American men are increasingly rejecting marriage. Why get married if your wife can legally walk all over you?

Several civic groups have initiated paternity fraud legislation. Their goal is to prevent men from having to pay child support for other men's children. At a minimum, any paternity fraud law should allow a divorced tricked husband to recover money paid to his fraudulent ex wife for child support. If necessary, the fraud ex wife can sue the other man for back child support payments. Some argue that mandatory DNA testing at birth would solve the paternity fraud problem.

Feminists, however, strongly oppose paternity fraud laws. They have attempted weaken or stop paternity fraud legislation.

In Oklahoma for example, paternity fraud was limted to only 5 years after the child's birth. If a wife is able to manipulate and fraud her husband (as well as the children) up to this time then legally the husband must raise and finance her boyfriend's child. Some have also resorted to insulting tricked husbands. In a Denver News Editorial, a pro feminist male journalist labeled tricked husbands as "the picky type whose parental love depends on a genetic link" and said they seek to throw their nonbiological children "overboard with a minimum of fuss". A feminist Temple University professor stated paternity fraud legislation is "really about men deserting children they have been parenting". A woman opposing paternity laws interviewed on ABC NEWS claimed "the children are the innocent victims in all of this [paternity fraud laws]." She causually left out the tricked husband.

Opponents of paternity fraud legislation claim they are mainly concerned for the child's well being. If that were true, they would be advocating divorce laws which award custody of the child to the honest "nonbiological father" rather than the fraudulent cheating mother. It was the tricked husband who was faithful and more likely to teach good behavior to the child. The wife was a fraud, a liar and a cheat. Are these good characteristics to pass on to children? Awarding custody to the tricked husband would mean the fraudulent ex wife has to pay child support. Opponents of paternity fraud laws are strongly against this idea.

Lastly, feminists traditionally argue the 'other man' meets the cheating wife's emotional needs because he is understanding. Her husband, they claim, is only concerned with himself. If feminists believe the 'other man' is so wonderful then why aren't feminist demanding he be the father and pay child support rather than the 'selfish' tricked husband?? Wouldn't a "wonderful' man teach better behavior than a selfish man? Feminists are full of female chauvinist crap!

Opposition to paternity fraud laws is not about the welfare of children. Rather, its about preserving the exploition of husbands for the benefit of selfish fraudulent wives. Its about continuing the idea a husband must do as he is told. Its about maintaining laws which judge people on the basis of their gender not their actions. Its all about preserving the feminist social order in America.

Single Men and Marriage

2008-06-16T21:24:00.002-05:00

A rare study of single men and marriage was completed recently by Carl Weisman. Over the past three decades the number of men remaining single has increased in the United States. Weisman said U.S. figures showed that in 1980 about 6 percent of men aged in their early 40s had never married but this number has now risen to 17 percent.

The purpose of the study was to discover single mens views on marriage and the reasons why they have not married. Weisman concluded that most single men were not afraid of marriage -- but they were afraid of a bad marriage. "Men are 10 times more scared of marrying the wrong person than of never getting married at all," he stated. The study found 8% of single men never want to marry, 30% are unsure about marriage, 31% might marry but only if they find the absolute right women while 31% want to get married but are still single.

Those single men who were financially successful stated they were terrified what a bad divorce would do to them. Some of these men gre up in families that have gone thru bad divorces or have had friends who have divorced. These men have seen first hand how America's feminist oriented divorce laws operate. Many successful single men fear losing assests which is an almost certainty in the United States. Those single men with limited finances fear not being equal partners with a working wife. This appears to be a valid fear. Havard University, Businessweek, the NYTimes and much of the US media have all emphasized wives make the majority of family purchasing decisions - the husband is generally ignored.

Women oriented media outlets also contribute to mens increasing mistrust of marriage. Outlets such as Oprah, Lifetime, Women's Day, The Today Show etc, continuously tell women every wife is wonderful. They claim anything wives do is for the benefit of their family. This is complete nonsense. Some wives are self centered jerks. They expect tasks to be completed according to their specifications and timetables. They work toward their own goals and expect the entire family to have these same goals. They will yell or cheat if they don't get their way. These wives are the same as dictoral husbands who take their wives for granted.

Any individual who expects others to have the same goals as they do - to behave the same way - is a self centered jerk.

Having a wife who is a self centered or cheating jerk is a waste of time. Its better to be single.

Weisman's study also discovered single men have found contentment with careers, friends and hobbies rather than marriage.

Feminists' anti husband divorce laws, along with the idea every wife is wonderful - no matter how self centered she behaves - are causing an increasing number of American men to reject marriage as a way of life.

6 Year Old Boy Sexual Harassment

2008-04-17T20:46:00.002-05:00

A 6 year old boy was suspended for sexual harassement at Potomac View Elementary School in Woodbridge, Virginia. Additionally, the elementary school called the police to report the incident. In Mass a 6 year old boy was suspended for sexual harassement by the Joseph Downey Elementary School, despite the fact the incident may not have even occurred. The police were also contacted. In Texas, a four year old boy was punished for sexual harassment after a female teacher's aide accused the pre-schooler of pressing his face into her breasts during a hug. In 2007, Maryland suspended three preschoolers, 16 kindergartners and 22 first-graders,for sexual harassment.

In the Texas example, the feminist teacher's aid should have been fired! A woman with her mentality should not be allowed to interact with boys.

Classroom infractions committed by 6 year old children should not be reported to the police. And, unless its a continious problem no 6 year old should be suspended from class. THEY ARE LITTLE KIDS WHO HAVEN'T GOT A CLUE AS TO WHATS GOING ON AROUND THEM! Let them stand in the corner for 15 minutes.

Schools across the country however are forced to act harshly toward little kids as a result of feminism.

During a 1999 grade school sexual harrassement lawsuit, the feminist group called the National Women's Law Center (NWLC) demanded all schools be financially liable for incidents deemed as sexual harassament. A school could avoid financial liablity if the child is severely punished. The NWLC stated these incidents denied girls equal access to education and therefore were in violation of Title IX laws. The Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 in favor of the lawsuit.

Subsequently, the US Department of Education issued sexual harassment guidelines. These guidelines were based almost entirely on the harassment definitions and ideology of another feminist group called the American Association of University Women (AAUW). This is why any child can be suspended for "inapproporiate looking" at another child and why a 6 year old boy is labeled a sexual harasser.

Any school not following the US Depatment of Education guidelines could be found in violation of title IX laws and therefore in violation of Federal civil rights laws. In any child to child incident, parents can sue the school claiming their child's civil rights were violated - if the school did not follow the guidelines.

The feminist group called the National Organization of Women (NOW) is in fact urging sexual harassment lawsuits against schools. They claim they don't want school arugments in the courts but then state:
"Lawsuits, and the threat of legal action, will give school administrators an incentive to end the sexual harassment that disadvantages girls and empowers boys in school. Without such lawsuits, girls will continue to suffer." Groups such as NOW add pressure on schools to severly punish children and in particular to harass boys.

Feminism has nothing to do with the education of children. The fact feminist groups have managed to influence disciplinary codes is a disgrace. It is almost the equivalent of allowing the KKK to write education policy. Feminism is a movement of discrimination - as such it should have no place in any school policy. The current education policies of the United States actually empower feminist groups to legally harass male students. Kids 4 to 7 years old do not know what they are doing. Labeling them sexual harassers and sexual predators is idiotic.

Consider also the show NBC Dateline "To Catch a Predator". Dateline's journalists routinely state 13 year old girls are too young to understand sex. Additionally, pshycologist and feminist alike have stated girls mature faster than boys. If a 13 year old girl is sexually naive HOW IN THE HELL COULD IT BE CLAIMED A 7 YEAR OLD BOY KNOWS PRECISELY WHAT HE IS DONG???

All of the suspended boys need to grow up understanding that they were victims of feminism.

FERRARO COMMENTS ON OBAMA

2008-03-13T20:58:00.002-05:00

Former vice presidential candidate and feminist Geraldine Ferraro (campaigning for Hillary Clinton) commented that Democrat Barack Obama is only where he is because he is a black man. She also stated "And if he was a woman he would not be in this position." and suggested Hillary Clinton has been a victim of a "very sexist media."

Ferraro's statements reflect the feminist mentality that is prevalent within Clinton's campaign.

It is difficult to believe being a black man with an Islamic sounding name (though Obama is apparently a Christian) gives a candidate an advantage in getting elected president of the United States - especially compared with a white female candidate. White feminist politicians such as Ferraro and Clinton typically have the mentality that they should not be challenged or questioned. Rather, they talk as though they should be elected simply because they are white females. Another Clinton campaigner (feminist Gloria Steinem) recently made light of presidential candidate John McCain's five years as a POW during the Vietnam War simply because he was a man.

Steinem is a sick sexist.

Ferraro's and Steinem's comments are a clear indication Hillary Clinton's campaign possesses a typical arrogant feminist mentality.

In regards to Ferraro's comments concerning the media, she is correct. The media is sexist - it is white female chauvinist!
There is a feminist culture throughout much of the national American media that forbids criticism of white female politicians (especially of the Democratic Party). Hillary Clinton's past mishandling of Health Care reform in 1994 is routinely glossed over or ignored by media gaints such as ABCnews, Time Magazine etc. (FoxNews appears to be the exception to this rule). If Hillary's name was Harry, the criticism would be unrelenting. Another example is the national media's treatment of hurricane Katrina. President Bush (white man) was heavily criticized by the national media. The Mayor of New Orleans, Ray Nagin, (black man) was heavily criticized by the national media. However, Governor Kathleen Blanco (white female) was sheltered by most of the national media (again the exception was FOX News). Bush and Nagin made mistakes but so did Blanco. She was Governor and therefore she was responsible for making decisions concerning feeding, sheltering and protecting people for a few days until Federal help could arrive. She failed.

Conversely, the same media organizations that refuse to question the decisions of Clinton or Blanco, routinely criticize and question the decisions of Condoleezza Rice (black female).

Ferraro was partly correct - the media is sexist. It is white female chauvinist.

Cheating Wife

2008-01-02T20:34:00.000-06:00

A feminist double standard continuously repeated within the US media is that cheating husbands are self centered jerks but a cheating wife is wonderful, understanding and considerate. The media also frequently repeats the feminist claim that its the husband's fault if a wife cheats and its the husband's fault if he cheats.

ABC News, Lifetime TV, Cosmopolitan, Oprah, WebMD, American Chronicle, Men's Health Magazine and several other outlets have often used this double standard.
A cheating wife is NOT different from a cheating husband. It is not a husband's fault if his wife cheats. A wife cheats because she is selfish and expects everything to be her way.

As evidence, an actual excuse given by one real life cheating wife for her infidelity was that she was mad at her husband because he didn't do what she told him to do. She then had an affair with a male co-worker who had made sexual advances toward her. Another cheating wife stated that as long as her husband "continues to pay the mortgage then thats all he needs to worry about. He doesn't need to worry about what I do." Another wife cheated because she felt like it and also stated she dated her male coworker "whenever I want a toy to play with." Another cheating wife said her husband does not excite her so she dates another man she met online. She also said it's easy to bullcrap her husband so she can leave the house and meet with the other man. Another cheating wife thought it was hysterical her husband was clueless especially since she has slept with some of his friends. Another cheating wife had a 2 month affair with another man but was caught. This cheating wife then told her husband she was sorry for hurting him and that she loved him. After 3 weeks, the husband accepted her apology. Ten months later, the wife began cheating again. A recently married wife thought that since she was an Aquarius the other man was cute and a Sagittarius it would be ok for her to cheat.

All of the above cheating wives required and expected their husbands to remain faithful.

Also as evidence of the self centerness of a cheating wife, the book "A Passion for More" which interviewed 100 cheating wives, stated 90% of these wives felt they were entitled to cheat on their husbands. Additionally, all of the wives in this book required their husbands to remain faithful.

A cheating wife is not wonderful, understanding and considerate. A cheating wife is a cheating wife because she is selfish and self centered. She has very little concern for her husband's feelings. Additionaly, a cheating wife believes her marriage should be mostly about what she wants rather than an equal partnership with her husband. If this does not occur, she cheats. Lastly, a cheating wife is also a hypocrite because while its acceptable for her to cheat, she requires her husband to remain faithful.

A cheating wife is the same as a cheating husband. Any description of a cheating husband APPLIES EQUALLY TO A CHEATING WIFE. When a cheating husband is described as a selfish jerk - so is a cheating wife. Only a female chauvinist jerk (ie a feminist) would claim elsewise.

Individuals should be judged on the basis of their actions not their gender (or race or any other stupidity). The persistent feminist inspired double standard within the media concerning cheating is simply narrow minded bull!

Female Double Standard

2007-11-20T20:58:00.000-06:00

According to Oprah Winfrey's talk show, husbands are rapist, cheats and violent abusers. Typical themes of her shows are: "The Day I Found Out My Husband Was a Child Molester", "Her Husband Tried to Kill Her Three Times", "Kidnapped and Raped by Her Husband", "Beauty Queen Raped by Her Husband", "Domestic Violence: A Woman Set on Fire and Burned Alive by Her Husband", "Suing Your Husband's Mistress" and "A Wife's Heartbreak" - her cheating husband. One telecast even went so far as to question a marriage's validity if a husband flirts with another woman. However, when the wife cheats, the show puts much of the blame on the husband.

The female chauvinist double standard that when a husband cheats its a husband's fault and when a wife cheats its the husband's fault is directly from feminist ideology. This double standard has been advanced by noted feminists such as Gloria Steinem - a women whose statements often harbored feelings of hostility toward men - by Newsweek Magazine (July 2004) and by the website "Style" around September 2007.

ANY WIFE WHO CHEATS IS THE SAME AS ANY HUSBAND WHO CHEATS.

The only husbands portrayed as worthwile by the show, are those which forfeit their individuality and become butler boys for their wives.

Oprah's show promotes feminist sterotypes and double standards.
If husbands are as rotten as this show claims then wouldn't a solution be for men to avoid becoming husbands and avoid getting married. Men could simply move from one women to the next - and everyone will be happy.

OHIO STRIP CLUBS

2007-10-10T21:14:00.001-05:00

Ohios's new statewide strip club laws ban lap dancing and will jail any patron or dancer who physically come in contact with one another.

A touch would be a fourth-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $250 fine. If the touch involves a "specified anatomical area'' - defined as the genitals, pubic region, or female breast - the crime would escalate to a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. The law also requires strip clubs and other "sexually oriented businesses'' to close between midnight and 6 A.M. Regular dance clubs may remain opend until 2 A.M. Citizens for Community Values, a Cincinnati organization, pressured the state to enact the law which could spread to other states. Ohio's new strip club regulations are almost identical to those enacted last year by Prince George's County Maryland as a result of feminist political pressure. The feminist sponsored law, however, was overthrown in the summer of 2007.

Citizens for Community Values claims the laws are needed to protect community values and decrease crime.

These statewide strip club laws were enacted in the same way the Iranian government enacts its laws.

Iranian laws regulate people's activity under the banner of "countering immoral behavior". Iran's clerics largely determine the standards of moral behavior. The police are then used to fine and arrest those who deviate from official standards of morality. Ohio's strip club law was enacted on the basis of "protecting community morals". The group, Citizens for Community Values, determined the moral values for Ohio. They then pressured the Ohio state government to enact strip club laws based on these moral values. Citizens for Community Values acted similair to Iran's government clerics. Ohio's various police departments are now required fine and arrest those who deviate from the moral values of Citizens for Community Values.
Ohio's laws are beginning to mirror Iran.

Additionally, the laws are double standard.
Ohio's strip club law will jail any man who gets a lapdance because of the supposed threat to public morality but will not arrest any cheating wife who tricks her husband into raising her boyfriend's child. Tricking a husband into raising another man's child is deemed as morally acceptable. Any tricked husband who gets a lapdance and is then arrested under the strip club law could validly sue not only the state but possibly the Citizens for Community Values for sex discrimination damages. Also, any dancer fined or jailed under this law would have the right to sue on the basis of harassment. The state cannot justify how she is a threat to public morals but the fraudulent wife is not.

Morality should be based on whether a person is stealing from somebody or stabbing somebody in the back not whether a person approves or disapproves of a particular activity.

Lastly, the claim any strip club causes crime was the same argument used by Prince George's County. This arguement was shown to be false. In fact, preliminary evidence indicates the opposite is true.

Ohio has 3 major cities: Cincinnati, Cleveland and Columbus. Of these three, Cincinnati, by a wide margin, has the least number of strip clubs - primilarly due to the activities of Citizens for Community Values which is based in this city. According to this group's arguments, Cincinnati should have the lowest murder rate among the three cities - by a wide margin. In fact it has the highest murder rate. Checking crime statics for 2004, 2005 and 2006, Cincinnati had the highest murder rate every single year.

It is NOT strip clubs that increase the crime rate, rather, it appears GROUPS SUCH AS CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES, VARIOUS FEMINIST ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER SIMILAIR GROUPS INCREASE CRIME. These organizations pressure local governments to outlaw any activity (such as lapdancing) they dont't like. The police must then waste resources and time enforcing regulations against the activity. These resources could have been used to prevent murder or other crimes.

Police forces are not meant to enforce any group's social ideology - unless you live in Iran.

The Feminist Media Machine

2007-08-26T17:38:00.000-05:00

Recently, the feminist media propaganda machine claimed that American wives don't want thier husbands and women increasingly hate marriage. CBS stated "More Women Saying 'I Don't.' MSNBC stated "Watch out, men! More women opt to live alone." Women's Day claimed 56% of wives don't want thier husbands. The media also implied men were happy with marriage. However, a study in 1999 found 15% of newly married men were unhappy compared with 1.5% of newly married wives - the chief complaint being the wife always expected to get her way.

If so many wives don't want their husbands and women hate marriage, perhaps the real question should be: Why should any man even bother to get married?

The feminist media machine also claims there is no boys education crisis. Time magazine recently printed an article stating the boys education crisis is a myth. Time gave many statistics comparing boys of today with those of 15 to 20 years ago but did not compare boys with girls of today. Time magazine's article corresponded with an article printed previously by the Washington Post. The Post's article also claimed the boys education crisis is a myth and emphasized nothing should be done to assist boys education.

The one important statistic both media outlets refused to print is:
57% of all U.S. bachelor’s degrees are earned by women. Men only earn 43%.

This is an exact reversal from 1970, when 57 percent of college graduates were males and 43 percent females. Ms magazine stated this reversal is a "landmark achievement" which should be celebrated. According to Ms magazine, when women earned only 43% of bachelor’s degrees it was due to sex dicrimination but when men earn only 43% of degrees its an achievement to be celebrated.

A college degree is important. An increasing number of businesses are requiring a college degree for entry level positions. US employers want to see a job applicant's college degree (any type of degree) as proof the aplicant can learn. Also, many blue-collar jobs are moving to low-wage countries. Therefore, a high school degree is becoming irrevelant. Both young men and women need a college education. However, the US feminist based education system emphasizes a young women's advancement while ignoring and sometimes even harrassing young boys. A prime example is the 6 year old Massachusetts boy who was suspended from school for alleged sexual harrassement. A 6 YEAR OLD BOY! Additionally, many univertisies offer academic scholarships exclusively to women but none exclusively to men - depsite the fact men are the minority.

The United States needs an education sytem which seeks the advancement of all its students rather than just particular groups of students. In order to achieve this,feminism needs to be removed from the current U.S. education system. The fact that men are earning a decreasing percentage of college degrees is evidence of this necessity.

Duke Lacrosse Stripper Case

2007-07-01T16:13:00.000-05:00

Many blame Mike Nifong for the Duke lacrosse stripper fiasco. However, an overlooked cause is the political pressure applied by the media, feminist organizations and civic activists groups against Durham County for prosecution of the lacrosse players.

Initially, the american media's coverage of the incident was based on political ideology rather than evidience. When the Duke players were not immediately suspended, a CNN reporter stated "I`m so glad they didn`t miss a lacrosse game over a little thing like gang rape!" ABC News claimed students could see "the margin for abuse in alcohol and testosterone-driven settings". Newsweek stated "the young woman who suffered injuries that appear to be caused by a sexual assault". The media also stated Duke University along with the lacrosse team appeared to be covering up the incident.

All of these statements were based on political agenda - in this case the promotion of feminist ideology. The lacrosse players were portrayed as typical men who were lairs, abusive and most probably rapists. The media's coverage was intended to increase public pressure to prosecute the "guilty" players. Though journalists have since sided with the players, their initial lack of objectivity illustrates the media can no longer be trusted for accuracy. There are simply too many feminist reporters and journalist in general who promote their own political agenda.

Similairly, feminists organizations sponsored a rally on Duke's campus claiming a rape took place and Duke University was not responding to the incident. They taped lacrosse players photos onto garbage cans in front of the student union. Feminists also assisted protesters outside a house rented by several lacrosse players. The protesters held signs reading "Real men don’t protect rapists", "You can’t rape and run" and "It’s Sunday morning, time to confess".

Feminist had no evidence of rape but simply based their conclusion on the most famous feminist quote "All men are potential rapists".These biased protests were intended to add pressure on Durham County to prosecute the lacrosse players.

Lastly, Al Sharpton did not help the situation. He traveled to Durham to support the idea the stripper was gang raped by Duke lacrosse players. Sharpton attempted to add pressure on Durham County to prosecute the lacrosse players. However, Sharpton became nothing more than a messenger of the old way - that people should be judged by what they look like rather than the facts.

The Duke lacrosse players avoided jail because their families had the cash to pay high priced lawyers who could fight off politcal pressure for prosecution. If they were average Joe's from Ohio State University with average lawyers they would probably be in jail.. How many innocent prisioners are in jail today as a result of political pressure from the local media, feminist groups or "Sharpton" type activists whether these activists be black, white, brown or yellow?

The media also used the incident to attack the stripper industry. However, the media only attacked strip clubs with female strippers - most news organizations don't have a problem with male strippers entertaining women. Typical of most news organizations, ABC News reported men as abusive to female strippers. They also portrayed female stripprs as drug users and the rape of female strippers as not uncommon.

The purpose of the attacks was to promote feminist sterotypes. The sterotype of men as abusive rapists and the degrading of women in a non feminist activity is a common feminist theme. The attacks further illustrate the media promotes its own political agenda.

Feminist Stupidity

2007-05-27T20:43:00.001-05:00

Recently, feminists within the California Judical Committee created and approved a bill (SB 353) which protects pets from domestic violence. The bill allows women to put restraining orders against men (accussed of domestic violence) from having contact with the couple's pets and allows women to gain custody of the pets. Both pets and women could receive legal and social assistance from the state.

In California, if a wife throws rocks, pots, hammers etc at her husband (or even stabs him) the state does not consider it domestic violence. California will not assist the husband. However if a husband throws these items at his wife she can except both financial, legal and social assistance from the state. As a result of SB 353, her cat can now expect legal and social assistance. In California, a man is considered as lower than a cat.

This type of legalized stupidy is why the feminist social order in the United States should be challenged and, ultimately, replaced with common sense. Feminists within many state governments continue to introduce laws based entirely on their female chauvinist mentality. These laws allow the feminists to maintain their social order across the country.

In Michigan, the feminist group called The National Organization for Women has said it will stop this state's attempt to change its existing divorce laws. Currently, Michigan law (which feminist groups helped write) awards custody of children soley to the wife when a divorcing couple cannot agree on arrangements. Several state officials want to award joint custody in these situations.

And to further emphasize feminist influence in American society, Baltimore Orioles anouncer, Rick Dempsey, recently joked about domestic violence against men. During a game broadcast, a player's wife was promoting a fundraiser for domestic violence victims. Dempsey stated: "Laura, will this kind of help Jay (Orioles left fielder) in the domestic violence area? If he doesn't start getting a few more hits, you might grab him around the neck and rough him up a little bit. [Is] this money going to go to help him a little bit with maybe some of the hospital bills or something like that?" Though nothing harmful or demeaning was meant, the fact this joke would never be said about a wife emphasizes the culture feminists have created in America. Additionally, the joke is more amazing considering a few years previously Baltimore Orioles pitcher Scott Erickson was arrested on domestic assault charges, despite the fact he did not assault his girlfriend. His girlfriend attacked him - throwing several objects at him. (The police were governored at the time by feminist friendly mayor Martin O'Malley. O'Malley is now Maryland's governor).

Using their influence within various government agencies, feminists have created a legal and social order based entirely on their own female chauvinist ideology.

Your Wife Isn't Worth It

2007-04-12T15:51:00.000-05:00

Eric McLean is accused of killing Sean Powell, an 18 year old high school student who was having an affair with Eric's 30 year old wife, Erin. The wife interned as a teacher and counselor at Sean Powell's Tennessee high school.

Eric will now become just another prisioner in jail. His wife isn't worth it.

Eric's goal of becoming a school band director is completely destroyed. His wife isn't worth it

It is normal for a husband (or wife) to be angry about being lied to and deceived. A husband has a right to be angry. However, any husband who becomes distraught enough over his cheating wife to destroy not only his own life, but also someone else's life, is simply a fool. His wife is not worth it.

To throw your life's goals away and rot in jail over a wife who lied to you and disregarded you - she simply is not worth it.

Eric McLean has two children. These may be taken from him, especially if he is in jail. To have your kids taken from you because of the actions of your anger - your wife is not worth it. Let her be somebody else's problem.

The man murdered by Eric McLean was barely an adult. Like most teenagers, Sean Powell made a young and dumb mistake. Getting involved with a teacher - who was married - was stupid. Had he been given the chance, he no doubt would have grown up to regret his youthful mistake. A mistake that really was not entirely his own. As a teacher, Erin McLean, (a grown, trained adult) was given the responsibility of advising high school kids - not dating them.

As an alternative, observe Richard Nowak. His wife, astronaut Lisa Nowak, deceived and lied to him in the same way as Erin McLean lied to Eric. Richard avoided violent and insane action. Now, he still has his kids and has the ability to sue the state for sex discrimination if they try to take them from him. If the state tries to force him to pay alimony, he will have the ability to sue for sex discrimination. Additionally, he has the option to replace his wife with a woman he does not have to share. AND, he still has his job at NASA. Eric McLean has none of these things. Instead he will be rotting a long time in jail over his wife. She simply is not worth it.

Because of their hatred of husbands, feminists commonly promote a "desperate housewife" culture and emphasize wives should cheat on their husbands. What this blog is saying is that this type of wife simply is not worth it.

Feminists Attempt to Eliminate Strip Clubs

2006-11-13T22:47:00.000-06:00

Feminist, in loose alliance with the religious right, are attempting to ban lap dancing and strongly regulate or eliminate strip clubs in Scottsdale Arizonia, suburban Washington DC (Prince George's County), suburban Cincinati (Kenton County) and Salem Oregon.

In Scottsdale, the feminist and religious right proposed a law to ban lap dancing by requiring a 4-foot barrier between dancers and patrons. The city council claimed lapdancing causes unemployment and lowers the "high standard of the community". However, the "high standard of the community" allows a cheating wife to trick her husband into raising her boyfriend's child. If the husband discovers this fraud and refuses, the Scottsdale "high standard" will jail him.

The feminist and their allies had a setback in September when a popular vote defeated the proposed law (52.5%-47.5%). Feminist and religious right supporters have stated they are still hopeful to impose the law on the city.

In an attempt to eliminate strip clubs, Prince George's county adopted a law prohibiting tipping on stage and prohibiting dancers from mingling with patrons (eliminating lapdancing). A feminist county official stated men should seek therapy if they want a lapdance. The feminist controlled county claims the law will curb crime, prevent a drop in property values and support county morals.

A triple murder occurred at the county's Stardust Inn strip club parking lot 3 years ago. The county then commissioned a study which stated strip clubs cause wide spread murder. However, murders (and drug use) have occurred at the county's ordinary dance clubs but Prince George's county has no intention of outlawing dance clubs.

Using 2006 county data (available up to June), I could find no murders at county strip clubs (two murders occurred six blocks from strip clubs). However, there were murders adjacent to several county schools (including Suitland High School & Prince George's Community College). The county has no intention of outlawing schools.

THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN MURDER AND EVERY COUNTY STRIP CLUB just as there is no correlation between murder and all dance clubs or schools. The feminist county's primary interest is in regulating society.

The county claims to be interested in preserving county morals. Yet, the county requires a tricked husband to financially support his cheating wife and her boyfriend's child.

The religious right are adopting this county's feminist arguments in Salem Oregon. Also, a similair alliance is now set up in suburban Cincinati (Kenton County).

It is feminist and rightwing local officials in each of these muncipalities that are causing high crime rates. Their extreme interset in promoting their own lifestyle and using laws as well as the police to enforce these ideas is draining both financial and physical resources away from hunting drug dealers, murderers and rapists. Police forces are not meant to enforce a polticians lifestyle preference -
unless you live in Iran.

Zoning strip clubs away from schools and residential areas is certainly acceptable. Using laws and police forces to promote your own lifestyle is ridiculous. Claiming they are guarding the municipality's moral standard by eliminating strip clubs yet at the same time allowing a rotten wife to trick her husband into raising her boyfriend's child is a classic feminist double standard. (See January Post for more info).

In history, an allaince between the extreme left and extreme right is NOT unpresendented. Early in World War II, Soviet Russia (extreme left) and Nazi Germany (extreme right) were violently oppossed to one another yet they allied. The result was the disentegration and subjugation of eastern europe.

The feminist and religious right are beginning to adopt a similair alliance. This is why voting is important. Political party loyalty is stupid - both the republician and democratic party suck! Vote against extremists, regardless of their party affiliation.

--------------------------

I may be unable to continue this site due to illness. However, hopefully, this blog's idea that the feminist social order needs to be replaced - hopefully by a system that judges people by their actions and not by whats on the outside - will be advanced by others. Hopefully blogger will leave this blog as long as possible.

California Legally Discriminates Against Men

2006-09-11T21:02:00.000-05:00

Incidents such as a wife burning her husband as happened recently in Mississippi or a wife shooting her preacher husband as happened in Tennessee are not considered domestic violence in the state of California.

California defines domestic violence as "the infliction or threat of physical harm against past or present adult or adolescent FEMALE intimate partners."

The state of California will not assist any husband that has been assualted, burned or otherwise harmed by his wife.

Feminist controlling the California assembly have recently written and passed a bill which purposely reinforces this discrimination. The bill, titled Ab2051, adds gay and lesbian partners to the state's definition of victims but purposely excludes hetersexual men. The bill also establishes domestic violence court and social services for gays and lesbians in addition to maintaining services for women BUT PURPOSELY EXCLUDES any assistance to heterosexual men.

California's Domestic Violence Program is administered by the Office of Emergency Services and an Advisory Council. The council primarily consists of "women only" groups such as: California Women Lawyers' Association, the State Commission on the Status of Women and various battered women service providers. These feminist oriented groups help maintain discrimination against hetersexual men.

There are only a few studies which have attempted to determine the rate of domestic violence against husbands. The Centers for Disease Control sites a South Carolina study indicating that 33% of all domestic violence in the U.S. is the wife assaulting the husband. "Indian Life" - a Christian media organization, sites a study indcating this rate is near 50%. A few other studies indicate this rate is betwteen 25% - 50%.

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER THE RATE 25% OR 50% OR WHETHER THE ATTACKER IS THE HUSBAND OR THE WIFE. ITS ALL THE SAME CRIME AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS THE SAME CRIME.. The fact California treats them differently, clearly indicates the corrupt feminist social order needs to be replaced.

California is a state which has produced notorious feminist such as Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer. This is why its important to vote. Party loyality is stupid. Both the republican and deomocratic party suck! What matters is whether the candidate is a feminist and if so - vote against them.

Concerning civil rights, California is run by the feminist similair to the way 1920's Alabama was run by white supremacist.

Duke Strippers and ABC News

2006-07-16T20:46:00.000-05:00

Feminist working at ABC News are using a stripper's rape allegations against Duke lacrosse players, to promote their female chauvinist ideology.
These journalists claimed they conducted interviews with college students across the US. However, their interviews emphasized men as abusive and female strippers as drug dealers.

They quote a former Harvard student "They (men) would always be very obnoxious to the girls. I see how guys treat strippers, and I can totally believe there might be abuse."
They quote a Cornell graduate "The guys are awful to the women. They scream at them to do lascivious acts and stick fingers in and around them."
Finally, ABC News said a Duke student stated each year his fraternity got a stripper for the new pledge class. He said that a fraternity brother also would buy drugs from the stripper and her pimp.

ABC News feminists also said students could see "the margin for abuse in alcohol and testosterone-driven settings". (Feminist of ABC News did not have a problem with male strippers entertaining female college students nor did they consider that form of entertainment as an estrogen-driven setting).

Additionally, the journalists attempted to portray (male) strip club patrons as possible rapists. They stated one of the two dancers they interviewed (named Summer) was sympethetic to the Duke stripper. ABC News stated Summer was raped by a strip club customer who initially was kind and that "many of the dancers she knew had been phsically abused".
This sexist sterotype is consistent with the famous feminist quote "Every man is a potential rapist".

ABC News feminists ended their segment by tacitly advocating violence against men. Their final words :

"The worst thing that ever happened to Cassidy
{a dancer} was the night a German tourist called her a b---. She took his beer bottle and slammed him in the head with it. She was suspended from her job, but she doesn't regret it. 'It was worth it,' she said. "

Cassidy should have been arrested on battery charges. Simply because she was called a derogatory name is not an excuse to commit a violent act. The next time ABC News feminists make another derogatory comment about men (most likely their next broadcast) can men slam beer bottles over the journalists' heads OR will ABC News suddenly advocate a different stamdard?

These are the same jouranlists who were outraged that a US military dog handler in Iraq allowed his dog to bark close to a terrorist suspect - thereby frightening the suspect. (The dog handler recieved 90 days hard labor for this supposed "attrocity"). ABC News claimed a soldier frieghtening a terrorist suspect is an attrocity. However, ABC News has no problem allowing their sexist jounalists to tacitly advocate violence against men.

For more on feminists and strippers see January Post

Wimbledon Tennis

2006-05-17T20:48:00.000-05:00

Feminist across the US were enraged when Wimbledon recently announced its men's tennis champion will receive $1.170 million while its women's champion "only" receives $1.117 million. These activist claimed it was an insult to women.

Women play only 3 game sets but men must play 5 game sets to earn their prize.

Feminist of Columbia University (a top ranked journalist school in New York City) claimed this was sex discrimination - women should be paid the same as men. They emphasized women don't need to play the same number of games as men because the women's game is different and unique, quoting tennis player Lindsey Davenport as saying "You hear about women playing only three sets while men play five. And the best women are never going to beat the best men. But its a different game you go to watch with the women--it doesn't make it better or worse." They also claimed women have more superstars than men.

Similar views were expressed by feminist of the Women's Tennis Association, the Christian Science Monitor and the Arizona Republic.
Even tennis star Venus Williams stated "This is not just about women's tennis but about women all over the world," "At Wimbledon we would like to have equal prize money to prove that we are equal on all fronts." But, she was not quoted as saying she would work an equal number of games as the men.

Additionally, many US media outlets stated Wimbledon should emulate the US Tennis Open. (The US Tennis Open has a three decade long history of discrimination against men. This organization pays men and women players equally but demands men play more games.)

The idea a man's work is inferior to a woman's work is the foundation of the feminist thinking presented by Columbia University, the Women's Tennis Association, the Christian Science Monitor, the Arizona Republic and the US Tennis Open. All of these organizations continually make excuses for women not playing an equal number of games as men.
Their argument is in effect saying a man must work 5 hours inorder to get paid the same as a women working 3 hours. Altenatively, if Wimbledon suddenly announced women would be paid the same as men BUT women must play 7 game sets while men play 5 game sets, feminist would scream sex discrimination.

Because of its stance, Wimbledon is now in a position to sweep aside feminist double standard. Wimbledon can agree to pay men and women equally but force women to play an equal number of games as men - three, five or seven game sets. This would instantly put pressure on the US Tennis Open to end its 3 decade long policy of dicrimination against men. Wimbledon would then be an example for the US Tennis Open to emulate.

It should be equal pay for equal work NOT equal pay for unequal work.

CNN Bias / Florida Teacher

2006-04-06T14:02:00.000-05:00

Two prime examples of feminist domanince in American society occurred in March.

In the first example, TV news giant, CNN, promoted a feminist oriented website called 'Don't Date Him Girl" This site will list the name of any cheating male but not cheating female. The site describes male cheaters (but not female cheaters) as liars and pigs. They also decribe male cheaters (but not female cheaters) as egotistic and immature jerks. This site claims they are developing a separate website listing the names of cheating women but nothing has yet been produced.

Why separate cheating men from cheating women since THEY ARE THE SAME THING.

CNN could have promoted the TV show "Cheaters" (which continually emphasizes there is no difference between a cheating man and cheating woman) - BUT IT DIDN'T. The fact CNN purposely promoted the female chauvinist website clearly demonstrates the strength of feminist influence inside CNN.

In the second example, a female Florida teacher (Debra Lafave) admitted having sex with a 14 year old boy. The sex occurred on multiple occasions in Marion and Hillsborough counties. The District Attorney's office in both counties agreed jail was not appropriate for the Florida teacher. Instead she recieved three years house arrest from both counties. The Marion County judge, however, rejected the light sentence. Marion County then dropped all charges due to the effect prolonged plea barginng and media coverage was having on the boy.

A man dating a 14 year old girl would not be prosecuted so leniently. As her ex-husband stated on MSNBC "...there is a double standard."
If the District Attorney believes jail is inappropriate for this type of incident then it should be inappropriate for any adult in this situation - not just white females.

Additonally, feminist of Equity Now are pressuring Congress to pass the "End Demand for Sex Trafficking Act". The intent of the "Act" is to jail any American male who hires a prostitute anywhere in the US (and feminist hope in the world) regardless of whether prostitution is legal in that state or country.

Thus, in this era of feminisim, a man visiting Nevada or another country where prostitution is legal can be jailed under this "Act" BUT a white female having sex with a boy in Florida (or several other states) is free to leave the court.

Episodes such as these are the result of feminist dominance in American society.

6 year old boy

2006-03-03T00:28:00.000-06:00

In Febuary, a 6 year old boy was accussed of sexual harassement by the Joseph Downey Elementary School, in Brockton, Massachusetts.

The school claims a girl complained to a teacher that the 6 year old boy put two fingers inside a her waistband, touching her skin. The boy stated the girl had touched him first so he touched her on her shirt.What should have happend next is that both children should have been sent to stand in the corner for 15 minutes Instead, human decency and common sense was replaced by feminism.

The school disregarded what the boy said (because the child wasn't a girl) and decided the boy knew exactly what he was doing. He was purposely making sexual contact with a girl. The school then suspended him for 3 days. The school also contacted the Plymouth County District Attorney's Office concerning the incident. Fortunately, the District Attorney'S Office said they would not file charges against the 6 year old.

What makes this incident worse is the feminist influenced media (NBC Dateline, Channel 2 News Baltimore, Channel 11 News Dallas, Channel 17 News Raleigh, Channel 16 News South Bend Indiana) recently broadcast stories stating men are predators if they go on the internet looking for 13 year old girls because these girls are too young to understand sex. Channel 2 News Houston broadcast stories about 16 year old girls searching the internet for laisons with older men. Channel 2 labeled these men as predators and Houston police have already arrested some of the men.

How is it that it can be claimed a 13 year old girl is naive about sex, a 16 year old girl is not responsible for her actions BUT a 6 year old boy knows exactly what he is doing - especially since feminists claim girls mentally mature faster than boys!

This incident occurred soley because of feminist input into school regulation codes.

What this boy needs to learn from his suspension is that HE WAS A VICTIM OF FEMINISM.

Strippers & Tricked Husbands

2006-01-13T21:52:00.000-06:00

Feminist claim female strippers (but not male strippers) are exploited.

They claim male customers force strippers to do whatever they want and "invoke male previlage to promote men as king and women as servant". As feminists from the University of Minnesota state "Stripclub cutomers perpetrate verbal, physical and sexual violence against women in strip clubs". These "activists" also claim strippers make little money because they must give up 50% of their income to the strip club.

Conversely, feminists claim husbands who are tricked by their cheating wives into raising children whom actually belong to another man are not exploited. They claim the husband can do whatever he wants.

The reality is that female strippers control their environment. Men can only do whatever the stripper allows them to do. A dancer will have any customer not obeying her limitations thrown out. Stripers FREELY chose to be naked and have the freedom to quit at any time.

Tricked husbands, however, do not control their environment. They have no freedom of choice. A tricked husband never chose to raise somebody else's child, his wife simply lies to him for the rest of his life. If a tricked husband leaves his wife, the feminist court system will force him to financially support the wife and her boyfriend's child.

Strippers give approximately 15%-25% of their income to the club. After this payment, strippers working in lap dance clubs, with no private areas, earn on average between $60,000-$100000. THIS INFORMATION IS FROM THE STRIPPERS THEMSELVES.
A tricked husband, however, works for his wife without payment.

A STRIPPER, WITH FREEDOM OF CHOICE, EARNING $60,000 IS NOT A SERVANT. RATHER, THE TRICKED HUSBAND WHO GETS PAID NOTHING AND IS EXPLOITED BY HIS WIFE, IS THE SERVANT.

Cities such as Scottsdale, Arizona and Houston, Texas have a "3 foot rule" (no customer may approach within 3' of a stripper) They claim allowing a man less than 3' from a stripper is detrimental to society & causes an increase in violent crime and drug use. Scottsdale has threatend to fine and arrest any man who breaks this rule. Houston originally did not enforce the law, however, feminist at TV station "KPRC Local 2 News" were so enraged, they broadcasted an "undercover investigation report" which demanded the law be enforced.

Converserly, these cities do not believe a wife exploting her tricked husband into raising her boyfriend's child is detrimential to society

If a tricked husband - forced by either city to financially support his wife's boyfriend's child - is arrested under this law he has the right to sue for sex discrimination. These cities cannot justify a law claiming this man causes a detrimential effect to society by sitting next to a stripper BUT a law allowing the exploitation of a him for the benefit of the wife is acceptable.

Close to Home

2005-11-17T19:54:00.000-06:00

Feminists commonly use their influence & control of the media to promote their sexist ideology. CBS's new drama "Close to Home" is the latest example.

This show was written solely from a feminist perspective. Its premire eposide promoted the feminist agenda of wives cheating on husbands. Housewives were cast as prostitutes. They became prostitutes because they liked the attention, or didn't want to bake, or liked the excitement, or no reason was even given. Their husbands didn't matter. The show emphasized a husband should not care if his wife sleeps around because his wife is a good person. During the episode, when a husband discovered his wife's prostitution the end result was he "loved her" because "She was a caring" person. He wanted to be with her.

Overall, "Close To Home" described housewife prostutites as "kind hearted", "caring" and "family oriented" women.
Conversely, 'Johns' were described as "embarassing", "disgusting", "fat" and "old". So, according to the writers, a wife who lies and cheats on her husband is caring and family oriented but a single man who sees a prostitute is disgusting and embarrasing - despite the fact he's not cheating on anybody. THIS IS ENTIRELY A FEMINIST PRINCIPLE.

Using a similair theme, feminist published a book in March 2005. This book examined 12 cheating wives and advocated a wife's cheating should not cause a divorce. It claimed many husbands will tolerate being cheated on. This book was reviewed and promoted on NBC's "Today Show".

Additionally, in July 2004, feminists wrote an extensive article on cheating wives for Newsweek Magazine. The article emphasized wives are increasingly cheating on their husbands and described the tricks wives use to cheat on their husbands. the article then insulted Bill Clinton for cheating on his wife (Notice the feminist double standard). The article concluded by stating a husband should not divorce his cheating wife because she is a good woman and "worth having".

The feminists continually use their influence in the media to promote their sexist ideololgy.

As a final thought, one of feminists' criticisms against female strippers (feminists have no problems with male strippers) is that they are "disruptive to the social fabric of society".
But in reality, the average female stripper is 18-25 yrs old and single. She is not cheating on anyone. She's not telling anyone to cheat. Feminists, however, promote cheating. They use the media to promote backstabbing and deception against men. Feminists cause disruption to the social fabric of society - not strippers.

October 2005

2005-10-06T19:40:00.001-05:00

Feminists control much of the US media - even posessing power within men's magazines.

For example, during the summer GQ magazine printed a large article about husbands having secret second wives. The article discussed the ways husbands "lie to" "decieve" and "use" both their wives. The article concluded by stating "women may bend the truth but men break it in half then in quarters".

What the article didn't tell you is that almost no husbands have second wives.
However, in the real world a much larger number of husbands are tricked by their cheating wives into raising her boyfriend's kids.

BUT a men's magazine DOES NOT consider a wife tricking her husband - for the rest of his life - as "breaking the truth in half"!

Feminists have extended their influence & bigotry to men's magazines.

Missing Person Bias

2005-08-25T15:49:00.000-05:00

Recently, NBC Dateline briefly examined media coverage of missing people. The media, Dateline explained, focuses almost entirely on missing white females. Rarely will the news media give coverage to a missing man or minority women. However, FBI statics show 53% of missing persons are males. Also, at least 34% are minorities.

This biased coverage should not be surprising considering feminists control much of the media AND the vast majority of feminists are white female.

Most of the feminist media ignored the story. The few outlets that did respond, attempted to minimize or divert attention away from their lack of coverage of missing males.

The New York Times stated "...many national news outlets focus relentlessly on missing white women, while giving little attention to equally compelling stories involving poorer minority women."
The LA Times as well as MS Magazine printed an extensive article emphasizing the lack of coverage of minority women but mentioned in only 3 sentences that men were the majority of missing persons.

Even the NBC news anchor (a white female) when advertizing the show, stated:
Is their an under reporting of missing minority women? Dateline will discuss the issue tonight.

If you are a white female - the feminists controlled media deems you as most important. If you are a minority woman, you are less important, and if you are a man the feminst run media deems you as worthless.

June 2005

2005-06-22T20:37:00.001-05:00

Recently NBC broadcast a story about a Kentucky National Guard unit which destroyed a terroist unit in Iraq. Rather than praise the entire unit for its bravery the feminist controlled outlet instead concentrated only on one white female soldier. Her actions no doubt took guts BUT so did the actions of the male soldiers (which comprised the vast majority of the unit!). However, NBC minimized all of them.

This is not the first time the US TV media broadcast stories which minimized male soldiers of a unit, and instead focused on a white female soldier.

The most famous example happend when US originally invaded Iraq. A US Army's Ordnance Maintenance Company got separated from its convoy and took a wrong turn near Nassiriya. It was ambushed, suffering many casualities.
The US media insisted a white female soldier (Jessica Lynch) from the unit put up fierce resistance, continually firing her gun until the Iraqis captured her. The feminist controlled media simply madeup the story. It was their way of promoting the feminist idea of white female superiorty.

Since the US army had no idea what happend, they could neither confirm nor deny the story. Subsequently, based on the wounds suffered by one of the dead soldiers recovered from the battlefield, the army believes the name of the person who put up fierce resistance is Donald Walters (the army believes he was captured then excuted by the fedeyeen - Sadam's internal security force) however since there are no US witnessses, the army cannot absolutley confirm it.

The media refused to broadcast anything about this soldier's story.
Furthermore when it was discovered the white female soldier may have posed topless with other soldiers the feminist media dropped her like a hot potato. (Even if she posed topless - so what. She wasn't a liar or cheat so why did the media suddenly consider her no good. Additionally, the fact she showed up and tried to do her job in a war zone is character enough but the feminist media originally tried to turn her into some white female god.)

These incidences show the anti male culture that now exists throughout much of the U.S. broadcast media as a result of feminist control.

And this anti male mentality, is why the broadcast media portrays young strippers / sexy models as stupid drug addicts. Anything men enjoy, the anti male media hates.

To Main Page

2005-03-09T20:19:00.000-06:00

Feminists have recently written a book which supports cheating against husbands.

This book gave 12 examples of wives who cheated. The authors said the wives cheated because its the husband's fault (he didn't listen or didn't dance with her or didn't compliment her or didn't meet her sexual demands blah blah blah...) and that its normal for a wife to consider cheating on her husband. The book also discussed lies the wives said to their kids when they cheated.

The book concluded by say cheating won't necessarily lead to divorce stating that 33% of husbands will tolerate being cheated on. (Interestingly, about 5 years ago feminists stated 60% of husbands will tolerate cheating wives. They then revised it to 50%, then to 40% and now apperently 33%).

Since the feminists control most of the US media, this book was naturally reviewed and expanded upon on the Today Show. In addition to emphasizing the book's major points the morning news stated "if a wife cheats with an older man it is
her father's fault". He didn't give her attention. (This theory has its roots in the feminist idea that women should be forbidden from dating older men but not younger men). The show then stated a husband cheats because "he wants a relationship he can control". He is able to control his relationship with the other women because he dictates when they can see each other. They concluded by saying
"(this) affair hurts both women" and that a wife should
tell the husband "he was a horrible jerk".

In summary, when a wife cheats its the husband's fault, when a husband cheats he is a jerk and
lastly, it should be acceptable for a wife to lie & cheat on her husband.
THESE ARE THE SEXIST IDEAS THESE FEMALE CHAUVINISTS REPRESENT.

Now consider this. These female "activists" constantly harass young women who become strippers, naked teens or sexy models claiming being a stripper or naked teen degrades, exploits & hurts people. But what really exploits and hurts people?
Is it the stripper or sexy model - generally a young women dancing / posing as job, getting paid and not trying to stab somebody in the back .

OR

is it the feminists who advocate lying and cheating against men and the sefish wife who expects everything to be her way & cheats when she does'nt get it?

Harvard President

2005-02-04T20:15:00.000-06:00

Harvard University President L. Summers has been critized by feminist for saying "innate differences between men & women in math and science" may make women less capable of succeeding in those two fields.
However, the female activists that critized him are the very same women whom have produced at least a dozen "studies" in which they claim that a man is not as smart as a women. They assert the "studies" show a woman's brain is "wired' superior to that of a man's.

THERE IS NO DIFFENCE IN SHORTSIGHTEDNESS BETWEEN WHAT THESE FEMALE ACTIVISTS CLAIM AND WHAT SUMMERS STATED.

They both claim superiority for chauvinistic reasons.
This incident emphasizes how completely full of crap and hypocracy the feminist mindset really is.

To his credit Summers apologized for his misguided comments. THE FEMINIST HAVE NEVER APOLOGIZED.
Then, as if to further emphasize their hypocracy, these women advocated hiring more female college teachers "to get greater gender balance" in Universities but they steadfastly refused to recognize any gender imbalance of teachers at the high school / grade school levels. [Most studies state approximately 75% of these teachers are women].

These double standard chauvinists are the same people who continually criticize young women who become strippers or sexy models as harmful to society. And they claim their logic is impeccable and consistent - yeah, right!