6 Year Old Boy Sexual Harassment
In the Texas example, the feminist teacher's aid should have been fired! A woman with her mentality should not be allowed to interact with boys.
Classroom infractions committed by 6 year old children should not be reported to the police. And, unless its a continious problem no 6 year old should be suspended from class. THEY ARE LITTLE KIDS WHO HAVEN'T GOT A CLUE AS TO WHATS GOING ON AROUND THEM! Let them stand in the corner for 15 minutes.
Schools across the country however are forced to act harshly toward little kids as a result of feminism.
During a 1999 grade school sexual harrassement lawsuit, the feminist group called the National Women's Law Center (NWLC) demanded all schools be financially liable for incidents deemed as sexual harassament. A school could avoid financial liablity if the child is severely punished. The NWLC stated these incidents denied girls equal access to education and therefore were in violation of Title IX laws. The Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 in favor of the lawsuit.
Subsequently, the US Department of Education issued sexual harassment guidelines. These guidelines were based almost entirely on the harassment definitions and ideology of another feminist group called the American Association of University Women (AAUW). This is why any child can be suspended for "inapproporiate looking" at another child and why a 6 year old boy is labeled a sexual harasser.
Any school not following the US Depatment of Education guidelines could be found in violation of title IX laws and therefore in violation of Federal civil rights laws. In any child to child incident, parents can sue the school claiming their child's civil rights were violated - if the school did not follow the guidelines.
The feminist group called the National Organization of Women (NOW) is in fact urging sexual harassment lawsuits against schools. They claim they don't want school arugments in the courts but then state:
"Lawsuits, and the threat of legal action, will give school administrators an incentive to end the sexual harassment that disadvantages girls and empowers boys in school. Without such lawsuits, girls will continue to suffer." Groups such as NOW add pressure on schools to severly punish children and in particular to harass boys.
Feminism has nothing to do with the education of children. The fact feminist groups have managed to influence disciplinary codes is a disgrace. It is almost the equivalent of allowing the KKK to write education policy. Feminism is a movement of discrimination - as such it should have no place in any school policy. The current education policies of the United States actually empower feminist groups to legally harass male students. Kids 4 to 7 years old do not know what they are doing. Labeling them sexual harassers and sexual predators is idiotic.
Consider also the show NBC Dateline "To Catch a Predator". Dateline's journalists routinely state 13 year old girls are too young to understand sex. Additionally, pshycologist and feminist alike have stated girls mature faster than boys. If a 13 year old girl is sexually naive HOW IN THE HELL COULD IT BE CLAIMED A 7 YEAR OLD BOY KNOWS PRECISELY WHAT HE IS DONG???
All of the suspended boys need to grow up understanding that they were victims of feminism.
Their not sexual harassers and sexual predators, their babies.
Because we live in a feminist society, that's why. Everything is a political football and a chance to marginalise male influence in society. Bascially, political women are to blame.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]